del cecchi
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:47 am Post subject:
Re: point-to-point busses |
|
|
"Mark W Brehob" <brehob@wildwood.eecs.umich.edu> wrote in message
news:SoSJd.670$UN1.136@news.itd.umich.edu...
| Quote: | Tim Clacy <nospamtcl@nospamphaseone.nospamdk> wrote:
Mark W Brehob wrote:
Sorry for popping in-and-out, really rough semester....
Yeah, after reading the paper, I agree. It is "out there".
Mark
...but beautiful. The RF ultra-wide-band physical layer is pretty
simple (no
security required, simpler error handling) and pretty low power and
allows
data rates of tens of Gbps... and allows multiple concurrent Gbps
channels
over a single crappy old conductor.
I don't know enough to judge it. But it is brave. If it works it
opens up
a whole can of worms with security I should think. But it is cool.
Mark
|
It's brave? nah. Talk is cheap. Especially University Grad student
talk. That is cheaper than free .
del cecchi
> |
|
Tim Clacy
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Jan 27, 2005 9:30 pm Post subject:
Re: point-to-point busses |
|
|
Mark W Brehob wrote:
| Quote: | Tim Clacy <nospamtcl@nospamphaseone.nospamdk> wrote:
Mark W Brehob wrote:
Sorry for popping in-and-out, really rough semester....
Yeah, after reading the paper, I agree. It is "out there".
Mark
...but beautiful. The RF ultra-wide-band physical layer is pretty
simple (no security required, simpler error handling) and pretty low
power and allows data rates of tens of Gbps... and allows multiple
concurrent Gbps channels over a single crappy old conductor.
I don't know enough to judge it. But it is brave. If it works it
opens up
a whole can of worms with security I should think. But it is cool.
Mark
|
There's not much of a security issue between periperals on a single PCB or
between chips in a single module. We'ere not talking about broadcasting
radio through the air here; we're only talking about channeling RF signals
along conductive strips. |
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in