| Author |
Message |
Bill Giovino
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:40 pm Post subject:
Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Product Li |
|
|
http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X. A parts
selection matrix is included.
- Bill Giovino
Executive Editor
http://Microcontroller.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Borowski
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:40 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
Hi,
"Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Product Line" ?
I think TI would have something to say about that - www.ti.com/msp430
And unlike the PIC24xxx parts, you can buy them today.
cheers,
Al |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Giovino
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:05 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Product Line - the
PIC24
Of course, I mean MICROCHIP's *first* 16-bit microcontroller... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Granville
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:56 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
Bill Giovino wrote:
[quote]http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X.
[/quote]
Maybe someone should tell Microchip about the XC166 ?
[Oh yes, that would make the Pic24 look worse, so that's why they'll
be keen to compare with a 15 year old core.... ]
-jg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Granville
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:59 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
Bill Giovino wrote:
[quote]Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Product Line - the
PIC24
Of course, I mean MICROCHIP's *first* 16-bit microcontroller...
[/quote]
Err, isn't this just a subset/respin of the dsPIC, so it't not
actually even Microchip's first 16 bit controller ?
[ but facts never get in the way of a good marketing banner...]
-jg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jyaron
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:15 am Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
| ouch... hammer that 'marketing'.. touchee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheDoc
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:05 am Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
"Bill Giovino" <editor@noospam-microcontroller.com> wrote in message
news:EaOdnRQBRskgC9benZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
[quote]http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X. A
parts
selection matrix is included.
- Bill Giovino
Executive Editor
http://Microcontroller.com
[/quote]
They mean of course "their" first 16 microcontroller product..
shame.. I guess they gave up with the 8 bit trash and are now attempting to
poison the 16 bit market
Just another "me too product"..
probably have to wait another 2 years for a useable c compiler to boot... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don McKenzie
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Burke
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:15 am Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
TheDoc wrote:
[quote]shame.. I guess they gave up with the 8 bit trash and are now attempting to
poison the 16 bit market
[/quote]
I wish some of the other micro producers would give as comprehensive a
coverage as Microchip. Their core architecture may be foul, but the
selection of packages (including DIP), peripherals, operating voltages,
and availability of development stuff leaves me utterly jealous.
Paul Burke |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hills
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:15 am Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
In article <EaOdnRQBRskgC9benZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@comcast.com>, Bill Giovino
<editor@noospam-microcontroller.com> writes
[quote]http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X. A parts
selection matrix is included.
- Bill Giovino
Executive Editor
http://Microcontroller.com
[/quote]
SO just as the 16 bit market is declining Microchip enter it.
The 8 bit parts are getting more powerful and thanks to ARM the 32 bit
ones a lot less expensive. The 16 bit market is on the decline.
There are a few well entrenched parts that will go on for some time but
now is not the time to introduce a new 16 bit family.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Burke
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:06 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
Ian Bell wrote:
[quote]Why, the 8051 has it beaten every way.
[/quote]
Especially for the vile arhitecture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Bell
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:00 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
Paul Burke wrote:
[quote]TheDoc wrote:
shame.. I guess they gave up with the 8 bit trash and are now attempting
to poison the 16 bit market
I wish some of the other micro producers would give as comprehensive a
coverage as Microchip. Their core architecture may be foul, but the
selection of packages (including DIP), peripherals, operating voltages,
and availability of development stuff leaves me utterly jealous.
Paul Burke
[/quote]
Why, the 8051 has it beaten every way.
Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James Beck
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
In article <buoU4UAvlLTDFAOt@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>, chris@phaedsys.org
says...
[quote]In article <EaOdnRQBRskgC9benZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@comcast.com>, Bill Giovino
editor@noospam-microcontroller.com> writes
http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X. A parts
selection matrix is included.
- Bill Giovino
Executive Editor
http://Microcontroller.com
SO just as the 16 bit market is declining Microchip enter it.
The 8 bit parts are getting more powerful and thanks to ARM the 32 bit
ones a lot less expensive. The 16 bit market is on the decline.
There are a few well entrenched parts that will go on for some time but
now is not the time to introduce a new 16 bit family.
It makes sense to me.[/quote]
Put out a migration path for your users that want a bit more processing
power so they won't look elsewhere.
Keeps the loyalty and money in their pocket.
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mochuelo
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:15 am Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:40:35 -0400, "Bill Giovino"
<editor@noospam-microcontroller.com> wrote:
[quote]http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X. A parts
selection matrix is included.
- Bill Giovino
Executive Editor
http://Microcontroller.com
[/quote]
Microchip sucks. I can't understand how come someone is paying 3.65
EUR for a PIC16F77, when an Atmel ATmega48 can be bought for 1.21 EUR.
(DigiKey, 100 pcs). The PIC is sheer crap compared to the AVR. I
didn't know so many rednecks were using MCUs. Otherwise, I can't
understand Microchip's survival.
Infineon C16X? What are you talking about? That is also sheer crap.
Get a life, and use any ARM7 (Philips, Atmel, TI, ...) or even a 24xx
TI DSP for a lower price. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sergio Masci
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:29 pm Post subject:
Re: Microchip Introduces First 16-bit Microcontroller Produc |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Mochuelo wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:40:35 -0400, "Bill Giovino"
editor@noospam-microcontroller.com> wrote:
http://microcontroller.com/news/microchip_pic24.asp
Up to 40MIPS performance, up to 256Kbytes Flash, a 23-bit address bus, and
Microchip's benchmarks show that it's faster than the Infineon C16X. A parts
selection matrix is included.
- Bill Giovino
Executive Editor
http://Microcontroller.com
Microchip sucks. I can't understand how come someone is paying 3.65
EUR for a PIC16F77, when an Atmel ATmega48 can be bought for 1.21 EUR.
(DigiKey, 100 pcs). The PIC is sheer crap compared to the AVR. I
didn't know so many rednecks were using MCUs. Otherwise, I can't
understand Microchip's survival.
Infineon C16X? What are you talking about? That is also sheer crap.
Get a life, and use any ARM7 (Philips, Atmel, TI, ...) or even a 24xx
TI DSP for a lower price.
|
Professionals solve problems and take advantage of the properties of a
"strange" architecture.
Amatures bellyache about everything to distract others from the fact that
they cannot compete with professionals.
Regards
Sergio Masci |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|