| Author |
Message |
bernard8950
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:31 pm Post subject:
IDE versus SATA HD. |
|
|
Is it true that ide hard drives perform slower than sata ones? I'
upgrading my system to Asus A8N-SLI, AMD ATHLON 64 3200 VENICE CORE
GAINWARD 6600GT SLI-PCI-E, 256Mb, (2X512MB CRUCIAL,DDR400,PC3200). I'
not sure which hd will suit the system best. A friend also told me tha
SATA hd can be problematic. I play a lot of games
--
bernard8950 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dennis Willson
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:16 am Post subject:
Re: IDE versus SATA HD. |
|
|
If your gaming then you won't (shouldn't) see the difference. Most games use excessive amounts of memory for speed and only
occsionally go to HD. I do lots of BF1942, BF2 and lots of flight simulation ranging from some of the older flight sims to the
newest Falcon. I have also done Warcraft (all versions), Starcraft, Doom and lots of others. All of the ones I have played were
memory intensive and not so much HD (except for initial program load and you won't notice)
SATA is actually primarily for servers. The feature "hot plug" so drives can be replaced without powering down or even rebooting the
server. While SATA II can go 3Mb/s, that's the interface speed and doesn't mean the drives can go that fast. SATA cables are smaller
so they restrict airflow less allowing smaller cases and SATA allows for longer cables for more complex RAID systems as well. SATA
is only 150Mb/s while SATA II is 3Mb/s.
bernard8950 wrote:
| Quote: | Is it true that ide hard drives perform slower than sata ones? I'm
upgrading my system to Asus A8N-SLI, AMD ATHLON 64 3200 VENICE CORE,
GAINWARD 6600GT SLI-PCI-E, 256Mb, (2X512MB CRUCIAL,DDR400,PC3200). I'm
not sure which hd will suit the system best. A friend also told me that
SATA hd can be problematic. I play a lot of games.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
David Magda
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:16 am Post subject:
Re: IDE versus SATA HD. |
|
|
Dennis Willson <giganews@taz-mania.com> writes:
| Quote: | SATA is only 150Mb/s while SATA II is 3Mb/s.
|
You want to try those numbers again? :) Do you mean 300Mb/s?
--
David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>
Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under
the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well
under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis Willson
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:16 am Post subject:
Re: IDE versus SATA HD. |
|
|
OOPs, No I mean 3Gb/s
David Magda wrote:
| Quote: | Dennis Willson <giganews@taz-mania.com> writes:
SATA is only 150Mb/s while SATA II is 3Mb/s.
You want to try those numbers again? :) Do you mean 300Mb/s?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nik Simpson
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:09 am Post subject:
Re: IDE versus SATA HD. |
|
|
"Dennis Willson" <giganews@taz-mania.com> wrote in message
news:gJOdnVOc9NL8MvfeRVn-hw@baytsp.com...
| Quote: | OOPs, No I mean 3Gb/s
|
And for the record, SATA drives (with the possible exception of the ESATA
spec) are no more natively hot-swappable than SCSI or FC.
--
Nik Simpson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in