bypass capacitors
CASTalk.com Forum Index CASTalk.com
Discussion of DSP, FPGA, storage and embedded system.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web castalk.com
bypass capacitors

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CASTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System
Author Message
Ross Marchant
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:15 am    Post subject: bypass capacitors Reply with quote

Just solved a nasty problem where my LCD display was being corrupted when
another part of the circuit was switched on. I needed a 10uF bypass
capactitor in addition to the 0.1uF already there.

What basic rules do people use for bypass capacitors, and capacitors in
general, when designing a new embedded circuit? My general rule is 0.1uF
bypass cap for each IC to remove high frequency AC and a few 10uF scattered
around, particularly in areas of high current usage.

Considering the importance of such capacitors, its amazing I wasn't taught
about them in embedded design at university!

Ross
Back to top
PeteS
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:15 am    Post subject: Re: bypass capacitors Reply with quote

Quote:
From a thread asking for maxims (on s.e.m)

There is no such thing as a purely digital circuit. Electromagnetic
Compliance testing proves this daily.

On the bypassing question, there was a long thread not so long ago.
Although rules of thumb are useful, they remain that, not solid rules
that may always be used.

I have parts that require both bulk and high frequency bypass. The
short answer is 'check the datasheet'

Cheers

PeteS
Back to top
Rob Turk
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:15 am    Post subject: Re: bypass capacitors Reply with quote

"Ross Marchant" <rossm@NOexceltech.SPAMcom.au> wrote in message
news:437abe9d$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Quote:
Just solved a nasty problem where my LCD display was being corrupted when
another part of the circuit was switched on. I needed a 10uF bypass
capactitor in addition to the 0.1uF already there.

What basic rules do people use for bypass capacitors, and capacitors in
general, when designing a new embedded circuit? My general rule is 0.1uF
bypass cap for each IC to remove high frequency AC and a few 10uF
scattered around, particularly in areas of high current usage.

Considering the importance of such capacitors, its amazing I wasn't taught
about them in embedded design at university!

Ross

If you need such large capacitors then I think you fixed the symptom, not
the cause. The 10uF caps you installed are not bypass caps but 'temporary
batteries'.

This actual cause is most likely a case of mixing signal ground with power
ground, using power traces that are too thin, or an insufficient power
supply. I'm sure you were taught to separate high-power sections of the
design from low-level signal sections?

Rob
Back to top
Ross Marchant
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:15 am    Post subject: Re: bypass capacitors Reply with quote

"Rob Turk" <_wipe_me_r.turk@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:ugAef.962$zc1.333@amstwist00...
Quote:
"Ross Marchant" <rossm@NOexceltech.SPAMcom.au> wrote in message
news:437abe9d$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Just solved a nasty problem where my LCD display was being corrupted when
another part of the circuit was switched on. I needed a 10uF bypass
capactitor in addition to the 0.1uF already there.

What basic rules do people use for bypass capacitors, and capacitors in
general, when designing a new embedded circuit? My general rule is 0.1uF
bypass cap for each IC to remove high frequency AC and a few 10uF
scattered around, particularly in areas of high current usage.

Considering the importance of such capacitors, its amazing I wasn't
taught about them in embedded design at university!

Ross

If you need such large capacitors then I think you fixed the symptom, not
the cause. The 10uF caps you installed are not bypass caps but 'temporary
batteries'.

This actual cause is most likely a case of mixing signal ground with power
ground, using power traces that are too thin, or an insufficient power
supply. I'm sure you were taught to separate high-power sections of the
design from low-level signal sections?

Rob

Hehe, you're right. I posted way to soon. Damn optimism. Problem was
incorrect port setup on the MCU turning on a latch for a brief moment when
it shouldn't have been. The latch enables various circuits, and the current
rush must have been too much for the lcd. Hence the 'temporary battery' that
fixed the problem.

At uni we were taught nothing about circuit layout in digital systems.
Everything was just 1's and 0's, no mention of the analogue side, race
conditions, ground bounce, etc. I've stumbled upon all the problems by
chance, and thanks to this newsgroup solved all of them. :)

Ross.
Back to top
Tauno Voipio
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:15 am    Post subject: Re: bypass capacitors Reply with quote

Ross Marchant wrote:
Quote:
"Rob Turk" <_wipe_me_r.turk@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:ugAef.962$zc1.333@amstwist00...

"Ross Marchant" <rossm@NOexceltech.SPAMcom.au> wrote in message
news:437abe9d$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

Just solved a nasty problem where my LCD display was being corrupted when
another part of the circuit was switched on. I needed a 10uF bypass
capactitor in addition to the 0.1uF already there.

What basic rules do people use for bypass capacitors, and capacitors in
general, when designing a new embedded circuit? My general rule is 0.1uF
bypass cap for each IC to remove high frequency AC and a few 10uF
scattered around, particularly in areas of high current usage.

Considering the importance of such capacitors, its amazing I wasn't
taught about them in embedded design at university!

Ross

If you need such large capacitors then I think you fixed the symptom, not
the cause. The 10uF caps you installed are not bypass caps but 'temporary
batteries'.

This actual cause is most likely a case of mixing signal ground with power
ground, using power traces that are too thin, or an insufficient power
supply. I'm sure you were taught to separate high-power sections of the
design from low-level signal sections?

Rob


Hehe, you're right. I posted way to soon. Damn optimism. Problem was
incorrect port setup on the MCU turning on a latch for a brief moment when
it shouldn't have been. The latch enables various circuits, and the current
rush must have been too much for the lcd. Hence the 'temporary battery' that
fixed the problem.

At uni we were taught nothing about circuit layout in digital systems.
Everything was just 1's and 0's, no mention of the analogue side, race
conditions, ground bounce, etc. I've stumbled upon all the problems by
chance, and thanks to this newsgroup solved all of them. :)


One of Don Vonada's engineering maxims:

Digital circuits are made of analog parts.

Lesson 1.

Just my EUR .02.

--

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
Back to top
Paul E. Bennett
Guest





Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: bypass capacitors Reply with quote

Tauno Voipio wrote:

Quote:
Hehe, you're right. I posted way to soon. Damn optimism. Problem was
incorrect port setup on the MCU turning on a latch for a brief moment
when it shouldn't have been. The latch enables various circuits, and the
current rush must have been too much for the lcd. Hence the 'temporary
battery' that fixed the problem.

At uni we were taught nothing about circuit layout in digital systems.
Everything was just 1's and 0's, no mention of the analogue side, race
conditions, ground bounce, etc. I've stumbled upon all the problems by
chance, and thanks to this newsgroup solved all of them. :)


One of Don Vonada's engineering maxims:

Digital circuits are made of analog parts.

......and more importantly these days they operate as though they were
little RF transmitters and receivers. Therefore, some RF theory would go a
long way in helping you to lay out PCB's so that they stood a chance of
behaving properly.

Look at the di/dt rates for all your circuits and ensure that the
transmission line (which is what the PCB tracks tend to be) impedance is
configured to be low enough at the appropriate frequencies.


--
********************************************************************
Paul E. Bennett ....................<email://peb@amleth.demon.co.uk>
Forth based HIDECS Consultancy .....<http://www.amleth.demon.co.uk/>
Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972
Tel: +44 (0)1235-811095
Going Forth Safely ....EBA. http://www.electric-boat-association.org.uk/
********************************************************************
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CASTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




VoIP Electronics Powered by phpBB