| Author |
Message |
Richard Owlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:16 am Post subject:
Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
I think I know the answers, but then again ;)
I have a "hobby" project to evaluate intelligibility of speech with
varying parameters ( primarily sample rate and bandwidth ).
[ for perspective, in a previous incantation I "discovered" formants ;]
My sample universe is a reading of the Bible recorded under studio
conditions. As it is a commercial recording, I'm assuming Nyquist is the
least restrictive criterion it meets.
Am I correct thinking that if I digitally filter my source to less than
3 kHz i can safely decimate to 8 kHz sample rate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jerry Avins
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:16 am Post subject:
Re: Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
Richard Owlett wrote:
| Quote: | I think I know the answers, but then again ;)
I have a "hobby" project to evaluate intelligibility of speech with
varying parameters ( primarily sample rate and bandwidth ).
[ for perspective, in a previous incantation I "discovered" formants ;]
My sample universe is a reading of the Bible recorded under studio
conditions. As it is a commercial recording, I'm assuming Nyquist is the
least restrictive criterion it meets.
Am I correct thinking that if I digitally filter my source to less than
3 kHz i can safely decimate to 8 kHz sample rate?
|
Yes
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jon Harris
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:15 am Post subject:
Re: Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
"Jerry Avins" <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:3cGdndRqqOuTVg3enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@rcn.net...
| Quote: | Richard Owlett wrote:
I think I know the answers, but then again ;)
I have a "hobby" project to evaluate intelligibility of speech with varying
parameters ( primarily sample rate and bandwidth ).
[ for perspective, in a previous incantation I "discovered" formants ;]
My sample universe is a reading of the Bible recorded under studio
conditions. As it is a commercial recording, I'm assuming Nyquist is the
least restrictive criterion it meets.
Am I correct thinking that if I digitally filter my source to less than 3 kHz
i can safely decimate to 8 kHz sample rate?
Yes
|
And if you filter is good enough, you can push the cut-off further up toward
4kHz. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rocky
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
Jon Harris wrote:
| Quote: | "Jerry Avins" <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:3cGdndRqqOuTVg3enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@rcn.net...
Richard Owlett wrote:
I think I know the answers, but then again ;)
I have a "hobby" project to evaluate intelligibility of speech with varying
parameters ( primarily sample rate and bandwidth ).
[ for perspective, in a previous incantation I "discovered" formants ;]
My sample universe is a reading of the Bible recorded under studio
conditions. As it is a commercial recording, I'm assuming Nyquist is the
least restrictive criterion it meets.
Am I correct thinking that if I digitally filter my source to less than 3 kHz
i can safely decimate to 8 kHz sample rate?
Yes
And if you filter is good enough, you can push the cut-off further up toward
4kHz.
|
You might want to consider a slightly heretical approach and set the
filter ABOVE nyquist! Use aliasing as one of the parameters. Try about
5KHz cuttoff with 8KHz sampling rate.
I think you might be surprised at the results if it is only speech you
are evaluating.
Regards
Rocky |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Owlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
Rocky wrote:
| Quote: | Jon Harris wrote:
"Jerry Avins" <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:3cGdndRqqOuTVg3enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@rcn.net...
Richard Owlett wrote:
I think I know the answers, but then again ;)
I have a "hobby" project to evaluate intelligibility of speech with varying
parameters ( primarily sample rate and bandwidth ).
[ for perspective, in a previous incantation I "discovered" formants ;]
My sample universe is a reading of the Bible recorded under studio
conditions. As it is a commercial recording, I'm assuming Nyquist is the
least restrictive criterion it meets.
Am I correct thinking that if I digitally filter my source to less than 3 kHz
i can safely decimate to 8 kHz sample rate?
Yes
And if you filter is good enough, you can push the cut-off further up toward
4kHz.
You might want to consider a slightly heretical approach and set the
filter ABOVE nyquist! Use aliasing as one of the parameters. Try about
5KHz cuttoff with 8KHz sampling rate.
I think you might be surprised at the results if it is only speech you
are evaluating.
Regards
Rocky
|
Moi. Heretical?
All I've done is suggest DSP be done in TECO, COBOL, or VBA in MSWord ;} |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Underwood
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
Richard Owlett wrote:
| Quote: | Rocky wrote:
Jon Harris wrote:
"Jerry Avins" <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:3cGdndRqqOuTVg3enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@rcn.net...
Richard Owlett wrote:
I think I know the answers, but then again ;)
I have a "hobby" project to evaluate intelligibility of speech with
varying
parameters ( primarily sample rate and bandwidth ).
[ for perspective, in a previous incantation I "discovered"
formants ;]
My sample universe is a reading of the Bible recorded under studio
conditions. As it is a commercial recording, I'm assuming Nyquist
is the
least restrictive criterion it meets.
Am I correct thinking that if I digitally filter my source to less
than 3 kHz
i can safely decimate to 8 kHz sample rate?
Yes
And if you filter is good enough, you can push the cut-off further up
toward
4kHz.
You might want to consider a slightly heretical approach and set the
filter ABOVE nyquist! Use aliasing as one of the parameters. Try about
5KHz cuttoff with 8KHz sampling rate.
I think you might be surprised at the results if it is only speech you
are evaluating.
Regards
Rocky
Moi. Heretical?
All I've done is suggest DSP be done in TECO, COBOL, or VBA in MSWord ;}
|
You missed one of the critically important ones - Excel and OpenOffice
spreadsheets. :-)
In the Lotus 123 days I did a lot of DSP experimentation in
spreadsheets. I had some fairly usable filter design stuff too. I wonder
if that is still on an old disk somwhere?
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter K.
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Filtering before changing sample rate |
|
|
Steve Underwood <steveu@dis.org> writes:
| Quote: | In the Lotus 123 days I did a lot of DSP experimentation in
spreadsheets. I had some fairly usable filter design stuff too. I
wonder if that is still on an old disk somwhere?
|
That'd be cool to see, if you can post it somewhere. :-)
Ciao,
Peter K. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|