Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... is it
CASTalk.com Forum Index CASTalk.com
Discussion of DSP, FPGA, storage and embedded system.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web castalk.com
Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... is it
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CASTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System
Author Message
larwe
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:50 am    Post subject: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... is it Reply with quote

I just sent this email to various addresses at CMP publications that
continue to spam me. Maybe I'll be able to get an answer.

--- 8< --- cut --- 8< ---
What exactly does one have to do to get out of CMP's clutches? Your
unsubscribe systems are obviously fraudulent - I have unsubscribed from
your junkmail DOZENS of times and yet it continues to flow. I have even
started to get junkmail from you at an email address that has never
been used to subscribe to any of your worthless advertising
circulars... I mean, "valuable industry publications".

I want to get my name out of your database permanently; I never want to
receive another communication from your spam foundries. HOW DO I
ACHIEVE THIS?
Back to top
Joerg
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:01 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

Hello Lewin,

Quote:
I just sent this email to various addresses at CMP publications that
continue to spam me. Maybe I'll be able to get an answer.


How 'bout finding the email address of the editor in chief and sending
said message there? If that doesn't do the trick maybe an auto-fwd of
all the unwanted email to the chief's address would do it.

Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Back to top
John Larkin
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:03 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On 20 Dec 2005 17:50:52 -0800, "larwe" <zwsdotcom@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
I just sent this email to various addresses at CMP publications that
continue to spam me. Maybe I'll be able to get an answer.

--- 8< --- cut --- 8< ---
What exactly does one have to do to get out of CMP's clutches? Your
unsubscribe systems are obviously fraudulent - I have unsubscribed from
your junkmail DOZENS of times and yet it continues to flow. I have even
started to get junkmail from you at an email address that has never
been used to subscribe to any of your worthless advertising
circulars... I mean, "valuable industry publications".

I want to get my name out of your database permanently; I never want to
receive another communication from your spam foundries. HOW DO I
ACHIEVE THIS?


I keep getting newsletters from the Reed publications group, and it's
apparently impossible to unsubscribe. I sent a number of emails
complaining (beyond "unsubscribe") without result.

Today I emailed the CEO of the group, threatening to pull our ads in
T&M World if they didn't stop. He answered me, apologized, and said
he'd fix it. We'll see.

They also send me a couple of other print mags (with their own
newsletters!) that I never requested and can't stop.

I get about as many newsletters as porn spam these days.

John
Back to top
Jim Thompson
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:06 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On 20 Dec 2005 17:50:52 -0800, "larwe" <zwsdotcom@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
I just sent this email to various addresses at CMP publications that
continue to spam me. Maybe I'll be able to get an answer.

--- 8< --- cut --- 8< ---
What exactly does one have to do to get out of CMP's clutches? Your
unsubscribe systems are obviously fraudulent - I have unsubscribed from
your junkmail DOZENS of times and yet it continues to flow. I have even
started to get junkmail from you at an email address that has never
been used to subscribe to any of your worthless advertising
circulars... I mean, "valuable industry publications".

I want to get my name out of your database permanently; I never want to
receive another communication from your spam foundries. HOW DO I
ACHIEVE THIS?

I maintain a filtering arrangement on my website. Each magazine is
assigned its own address. Recalcitrant mailers magically cease to
have an address.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

"Winners never quit, quitters never win", Jack Bradley Budnik ~1956
Back to top
Spehro Pefhany
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:29 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:03:00 -0800, the renowned John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

Quote:

I get about as many newsletters as porn spam these days.

John

At least the newsletters don't morph their headers to avoid your
filters, generally. They still eat a bit of bandwidth, but that's
pretty much free.

I was just looking at the traffice on the USB bus to and from my
scanner. There's a lot of stuff going on all the time, even when
nothing's getting done. Probably like the next week or two in most
workplaces.


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Back to top
John Larkin
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:29:48 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
<speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:03:00 -0800, the renowned John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


I get about as many newsletters as porn spam these days.

John

At least the newsletters don't morph their headers to avoid your
filters, generally. They still eat a bit of bandwidth, but that's
pretty much free.

I was just looking at the traffice on the USB bus to and from my
scanner. There's a lot of stuff going on all the time, even when
nothing's getting done. Probably like the next week or two in most
workplaces.


There's still a lot going on in *our* workplace. Eating, mostly.

John
Back to top
SioL
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 5:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote in message news:i2ehq1dcqru0g344pij6hniisp65nhvu9f@4ax.com...

Quote:
I maintain a filtering arrangement on my website. Each magazine is
assigned its own address. Recalcitrant mailers magically cease to
have an address.

...Jim Thompson

I have found greylisting to do wonders.

Greylisting looks at the IP address of the sender and the recipient address. If the system does not recognize this information, then
it will temporarily reject the e-mail. All legitimate e-mail systems will attempt to resend the e-mail at a later time, and the
e-mail will go through.

Most applications that send junk e-mail just send junk e-mail messages once and do not attempt to resend them. These junk e-mail
applications use the "fire-and-forget" method, which means that if the junk e-mailer was unsuccessful at sending junk e-mail to a
particular e-mail address, the application will not try to resend that e-mail message.

Greylisting does not delete legitimate e-mail messages. All legitimate e-mails will be successfully delivered using greylisting. The
only potential effect greylisting may have for pair Networks customers is a slight delay in the delivery of legitimate e-mail
messages.


Siol
------------------------------------------------
Rather than a heartless beep
Or a rude error message,
See these simple words: "File not found."
Back to top
Andy Peters
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

Spehro Pefhany wrote:

Quote:
I was just looking at the traffice on the USB bus to and from my
scanner. There's a lot of stuff going on all the time, even when
nothing's getting done.

That's the HID interface. The device configuration specifics how often
the host polls the HID interface. If nothing's changed (if you didn't
press a button, perhaps) then the device simply NAKs the host. If the
device has something interesting to send, then the device response is a
complete HID report.

-a
Back to top
John Larkin
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On 21 Dec 2005 09:38:30 -0800, "Andy Peters" <Bassman59a@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
Spehro Pefhany wrote:

I was just looking at the traffice on the USB bus to and from my
scanner. There's a lot of stuff going on all the time, even when
nothing's getting done.

That's the HID interface. The device configuration specifics how often
the host polls the HID interface. If nothing's changed (if you didn't
press a button, perhaps) then the device simply NAKs the host. If the
device has something interesting to send, then the device response is a
complete HID report.

-a

That's because USB was designed to be CPU-centric, and not a
general-purpose bus.

John
Back to top
Jim Granville
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

SioL wrote:
Quote:
"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote in message news:i2ehq1dcqru0g344pij6hniisp65nhvu9f@4ax.com...


I maintain a filtering arrangement on my website. Each magazine is
assigned its own address. Recalcitrant mailers magically cease to
have an address.

...Jim Thompson


I have found greylisting to do wonders.

Greylisting looks at the IP address of the sender and the recipient address. If the system does not recognize this information, then
it will temporarily reject the e-mail. All legitimate e-mail systems will attempt to resend the e-mail at a later time, and the
e-mail will go through.

Most applications that send junk e-mail just send junk e-mail messages once and do not attempt to resend them. These junk e-mail
applications use the "fire-and-forget" method, which means that if the junk e-mailer was unsuccessful at sending junk e-mail to a
particular e-mail address, the application will not try to resend that e-mail message.

Greylisting does not delete legitimate e-mail messages. All legitimate e-mails will be successfully delivered using greylisting. The
only potential effect greylisting may have for pair Networks customers is a slight delay in the delivery of legitimate e-mail
messages.

.... Until the spammers realize this, and start a "Fire twice and
forget" algorithm, and now you have twice the volume of spam on the
network....

-jg
Back to top
Joel Kolstad
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:iucjq1tql6tvmrashc8la50alkned99qma@4ax.com...
Quote:
That's because USB was designed to be CPU-centric, and not a
general-purpose bus.

Yes, although with "USB on-the-go" it's inching closer to becoming general
purpose.

USB still strikes me as somewhat needlessly complex while not delivering much
more than Firewire can...
Back to top
John Larkin
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:45:31 -0800, "Joel Kolstad"
<JKolstad71HatesSpam@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:iucjq1tql6tvmrashc8la50alkned99qma@4ax.com...
That's because USB was designed to be CPU-centric, and not a
general-purpose bus.

Yes, although with "USB on-the-go" it's inching closer to becoming general
purpose.

USB still strikes me as somewhat needlessly complex while not delivering much
more than Firewire can...


All the Intel stuff, like PCI I2C and Itanic, are needlessly complex.

John
Back to top
Stef
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

In comp.arch.embedded,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:

All the Intel stuff, like PCI I2C and Itanic, are needlessly complex.

Ahum, I2C is not from Intel, it's Philips.

And I2C complex? Have you ever used it? And I wouldn't know where to start
comparing it to PCI. ;-)

--
Stef (remove caps, dashes and .invalid from e-mail address to reply by mail)

SHIFT TO THE LEFT!
SHIFT TO THE RIGHT!
POP UP, PUSH DOWN,
BYTE, BYTE, BYTE!
Back to top
Stef
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

In comp.arch.embedded,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:00:07 -0600, Dave Hansen <iddw@hotmail.com
wrote:


Dallas OneWire is more complex still...

---
Of course.

If anyone could figure out Zero Wire it would be even more complex.

Oops, unless I've spilled the beans and Zero Wire is an RF
protocol...

Yup, you spilled them all and beat me to it. ;-)


But the logic is a bit flawed if you take it to the other extreme:
A lot of wires does not make it simple, take a look at PCI. Oops,
now I did start to compare them myself. ;-)

Ok, back to regular lurking....


--
Stef (remove caps, dashes and .invalid from e-mail address to reply by mail)

Be careful! Is it classified?
Back to top
John Fields
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject: Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i Reply with quote

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:00:07 -0600, Dave Hansen <iddw@hotmail.com>
wrote:


Quote:
Dallas OneWire is more complex still...

---
Of course.

If anyone could figure out Zero Wire it would be even more complex.

Oops, unless I've spilled the beans and Zero Wire is an RF
protocol...


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CASTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




VoIP Electronics Powered by phpBB