| Author |
Message |
Dave Hansen
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:15 am Post subject:
Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:33:15 +0100 in comp.arch.embedded,
stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid (Stef) wrote:
| Quote: | In comp.arch.embedded,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
All the Intel stuff, like PCI I2C and Itanic, are needlessly complex.
Ahum, I2C is not from Intel, it's Philips.
And I2C complex? Have you ever used it? And I wouldn't know where to start
comparing it to PCI. ;-)
|
Or Itanic for that matter...
I2C (or TWI if you're trying to avoid an IP battle with Philips) _is_
quite a bit more complex than SPI. But SPI takes a minimum of four
signals (MOSI, MISO, SCLK, and one select line per slave), whereas I2C
takes just two.
Dallas OneWire is more complex still...
Regards,
-=Dave
--
Change is inevitable, progress is not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anton Erasmus
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:15 am Post subject:
Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:33:15 +0100,
stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid (Stef) wrote:
| Quote: | In comp.arch.embedded,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
All the Intel stuff, like PCI I2C and Itanic, are needlessly complex.
Ahum, I2C is not from Intel, it's Philips.
And I2C complex? Have you ever used it? And I wouldn't know where to start
comparing it to PCI. ;-)
|
I think he meant I2S, which AFAICR an intel thing.
Regards
Anton Erasmus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dave Hansen
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:04:45 +0200 in comp.arch.embedded, Anton
Erasmus <nobody@spam.prevent.net> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:33:15 +0100,
stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid (Stef) wrote:
In comp.arch.embedded,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
All the Intel stuff, like PCI I2C and Itanic, are needlessly complex.
Ahum, I2C is not from Intel, it's Philips.
And I2C complex? Have you ever used it? And I wouldn't know where to start
comparing it to PCI. ;-)
I think he meant I2S, which AFAICR an intel thing.
|
Inter-IC Sound? That's Philips too, AFAIK.
Or is there yet something else?
Regards,
-=Dave
--
Change is inevitable, progress is not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anton Erasmus
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:24 pm Post subject:
Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:17:28 -0600, Dave Hansen <iddw@hotmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:04:45 +0200 in comp.arch.embedded, Anton
Erasmus <nobody@spam.prevent.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:33:15 +0100,
stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid (Stef) wrote:
In comp.arch.embedded,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
All the Intel stuff, like PCI I2C and Itanic, are needlessly complex.
Ahum, I2C is not from Intel, it's Philips.
And I2C complex? Have you ever used it? And I wouldn't know where to start
comparing it to PCI. ;-)
I think he meant I2S, which AFAICR an intel thing.
Inter-IC Sound? That's Philips too, AFAIK.
Or is there yet something else?
|
There was some sort of Intelligent I/O system that intel did a while
ago. I am not sure if it is being used in anything.
I have just googled and it is called I2O. The i960 was targeted for
this application.
Regards
Anton Erasmus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ben Bradley
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Dec 25, 2005 5:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i |
|
|
On 20 Dec 2005 17:50:52 -0800, "larwe" <zwsdotcom@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | I just sent this email to various addresses at CMP publications that
continue to spam me. Maybe I'll be able to get an answer.
|
Everyone has some sort of webhost you can report spam to and
they'll slap the organization (most webhost will drop a customer for
repeated spamming), but it appears eetimes does its own hosting.
Everyone pays someone for bandwidth to connect to others, but it
appears these clowns connect through qwest.net, which I recall from
years ago as being uu.net, notorious for ignoring spam complaints
about the people they sell bandwidth to. So that method doesn't look
like it would do anything in this case.
| Quote: | --- 8< --- cut --- 8< ---
What exactly does one have to do to get out of CMP's clutches? Your
unsubscribe systems are obviously fraudulent - I have unsubscribed from
your junkmail DOZENS of times and yet it continues to flow. I have even
|
Here's an idea, generate a new, 'virgin' account and 'ubsubscribe'
it, and see how long it takes for the spam to show up. I see you have
gmail, you can do your own invites.
| Quote: | started to get junkmail from you at an email address that has never
been used to subscribe to any of your worthless advertising
circulars... I mean, "valuable industry publications".
I want to get my name out of your database permanently; I never want to
receive another communication from your spam foundries. HOW DO I
ACHIEVE THIS?
|
Read up on the CAN SPAM act, while it doesn't slow down the
intentionally criminal spammers, perhaps there's something in it that
will stop such a "mainslease" spammer. It may get their attention if a
government official notifies them that they're violating federal law
(IIRC CAN SPAM requires a WORKING 'remove' mechanism). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim Thompson
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 26, 2005 12:07 am Post subject:
Re: Trying to unsubscribe from CMP's spam (e.g EETimes)... i |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:07:37 GMT, Ben Bradley
<ben_nospam_bradley@frontiernet.net> wrote:
| Quote: | On 20 Dec 2005 17:50:52 -0800, "larwe" <zwsdotcom@gmail.com> wrote:
I just sent this email to various addresses at CMP publications that
continue to spam me. Maybe I'll be able to get an answer.
[snip]
I want to get my name out of your database permanently; I never want to
receive another communication from your spam foundries. HOW DO I
ACHIEVE THIS?
Read up on the CAN SPAM act, while it doesn't slow down the
intentionally criminal spammers, perhaps there's something in it that
will stop such a "mainslease" spammer. It may get their attention if a
government official notifies them that they're violating federal law
(IIRC CAN SPAM requires a WORKING 'remove' mechanism).
|
The way I do it is with E-mail forwarding from my website.
EACH magazine/whatever gets its/his/her own personalized E-mail
address.
When I unsubscribe, as I did recently from Electronic Products, I give
them a week to actually do their unsubscribe thing.
When Electronic Products didn't, I simply removed EPMag@... from my
accepted list.
Since only personalized addresses are forwarded, I haven't received
any true blanket spams in probably a year.
My unused dummy account name at Cox has collected 2014 spams since
November 9, and they claim they protect me from spam ;-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
"Winners never quit, quitters never win", Jack Bradley Budnik ~1956 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in