| Author |
Message |
Brig Campbell
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colin Percival
Guest
|
 Posted:
Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:03 pm Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@hda.hydro.com> wrote:
It's news to me. :-)
Colin Percival |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Terje Mathisen
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
Brig Campbell wrote:
| Quote: | http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=21089
|
Yes, is this supposed to be news?
Terje
--
- <Terje.Mathisen@hda.hydro.com>
"almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Todd
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:29 pm Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
Brig Campbell wrote:
| Quote: | http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=21089
|
Hmmm. One *might* tend to infer from that that Intel has seen the light
and has significant plans for the future of x86-64: good for Intel and
the industry as a whole and not necessarily bad for AMD, but it raises
yet more questions about the future of Itanic.
- bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Klaus Fehrle
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:25 pm Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
Bill Todd wrote:
| Quote: | Brig Campbell wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=21089
Hmmm. One *might* tend to infer from that that Intel has seen the light
and has significant plans for the future of x86-64: good for Intel and
the industry as a whole and not necessarily bad for AMD, but it raises
yet more questions about the future of Itanic.
- bill
|
Hmm. Usenet grafics coming from Intel then? Well, i'd appreciate it. :-)
K. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Niels Jørgen Kruse
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:39 pm Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
Bill Todd <billtodd@metrocast.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Brig Campbell wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=21089
Hmmm. One *might* tend to infer from that that Intel has seen the light
and has significant plans for the future of x86-64: good for Intel and
the industry as a whole and not necessarily bad for AMD, but it raises
yet more questions about the future of Itanic.
|
Didn't AG have a proposal for how to build an x86 with an IA64 mode?
That would be a way to avoid IA64 being confined to an ever smaller
niche. (Which otherwise looks to be in the cards.)
--
Mvh./Regards, Niels Jørgen Kruse, Vanløse, Denmark |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gavin Scott
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:53 am Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
Niels J?rgen Kruse <nospam@ab-katrinedal.dk> wrote:
| Quote: | Didn't AG have a proposal for how to build an x86 with an IA64 mode?
|
Isn't this the equivalent of trying to design an efficient family
automobile that can at the same time serve as a replacement for the
Space Shuttle?
G. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bruce Hoult
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 06, 2005 7:54 am Post subject:
Re: Andy Glew back at Intel? |
|
|
In article <110a919slu061a5@news.supernews.com>,
gavin@allegro.com (Gavin Scott) wrote:
| Quote: | Niels J?rgen Kruse <nospam@ab-katrinedal.dk> wrote:
Didn't AG have a proposal for how to build an x86 with an IA64 mode?
Isn't this the equivalent of trying to design an efficient family
automobile that can at the same time serve as a replacement for the
Space Shuttle?
|
It would be ... except for the fact that the Space Shuttle is, all by
itself, already an excellent example of the problem.
--
Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+-
Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in