| Author |
Message |
flux
Guest
|
 Posted:
Sat Dec 18, 2004 7:57 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
In article <ha55s0p6apuj48hf9ccoh32mj0ivji8fgi@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
| Quote: | Where is this demonstration?
Earlier in the thread. Go back and read it, you idiot!
|
I don't see it.
| Quote: | So where is it in actual use?
Well, back in 1998 (i.e. before the standard was finalized), we used
it as a data collection channel for a test cell of a satellite sensor.
So that is why Dell is putting it in laptops.
Check a calendar, you idiot! But I'm glad you've realized that Dell
*is* putting it in laptops in 2004.
Logic?
Your aggressive stupidity is truly remarkable. Not laudable, mind,
but remarkable.
You seem very fond of this "logic?" response, as if it means
something.
|
It implies there is no logic in the above statement.
| Quote: | In 1998, we (i.e. a group of professionals, not school kids) used it
for a given purpose (see above). You tried to extrapolate that usage
(from 1998) to Dell's inclusion of a feature in a laptop in 2004.
There is no connection between the two. But you tried to (bogusly)
make one.
|
I thought it was the other way around.
| Quote: | Yup. Your task, now, is to show that CompUSA (and every other store)
is just stupid and no-one is buying the stuff.
Logic?
Yes, you need some.
Where is it? The logic?
Right there, above. Can you not read English? Retail outlets are
including this feature... why?
|
I don't see it.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
|
Another "Logic"?
| Quote: | You now need to use some "logic" to explain why *my* explanation is
faulty, and *yours* (as yet missing) is not.
Do it, flux-boy.
You want to try to argue that the fact that 1000BaseT is a commodity
available in consumer stores has no relevance. Go ahead. Argue it.
I already have.
No, you haven't. Don't lie. It makes you look even sillier than the
rest of your posting!
|
Perhaps you should reread the thread.
| Quote: | That's the logic that *you* need.
I (and others) have presented vast amounts of information that
supports the contention that you are too dumb to accept.
And you are going to post this?
Obviously you are unfamiliar with the English language. Check the
tense, boy.
|
Future. Because it hasn't happened yet.
| Quote: | The only thing I've seen is something about gigabit and 1999, which
doesn't seem to have any relevance to your argument. What exactly is
your argument?
Go back and read it, dimwit!
|
It isn't there.
| Quote: | You claimed a given technology is "new". I've shown it isn't.
|
But it *is* new.
| Quote: | You know the significance, laddy.
|
I do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Malcolm Weir
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Dec 19, 2004 3:06 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 06:19:46 GMT, flux <support@fluxsoft.com> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <ha55s0p6apuj48hf9ccoh32mj0ivji8fgi@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
Where is this demonstration?
Earlier in the thread. Go back and read it, you idiot!
I don't see it.
|
Evidently. However, that is indicative of your blindness, nothing
else.
[ Snip ]
| Quote: | Check a calendar, you idiot! But I'm glad you've realized that Dell
*is* putting it in laptops in 2004.
Logic?
Your aggressive stupidity is truly remarkable. Not laudable, mind,
but remarkable.
You seem very fond of this "logic?" response, as if it means
something.
It implies there is no logic in the above statement.
|
No, it doesn't. It clearly notes that in my opinion (shared,
apparently, by a significant number of professionals) your
observations are (to be polite) foolish, and it also notes that you
attempt to conceal your foolishness by one-line responses which I
suspect you think look clever.
They don't. You look like a fool. I personally think that's an
accurate reflection of you.
| Quote: | In 1998, we (i.e. a group of professionals, not school kids) used it
for a given purpose (see above). You tried to extrapolate that usage
(from 1998) to Dell's inclusion of a feature in a laptop in 2004.
There is no connection between the two. But you tried to (bogusly)
make one.
I thought it was the other way around.
|
Which says a lot about what *you* thought, but we've pretty
established your lack of significant ability when it comes to thought.
| Quote: | Yup. Your task, now, is to show that CompUSA (and every other store)
is just stupid and no-one is buying the stuff.
Logic?
Yes, you need some.
Where is it? The logic?
Right there, above. Can you not read English? Retail outlets are
including this feature... why?
I don't see it.
|
Again, evidently, and at this stage your blindness is your problem.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
Another "Logic"?
|
Nope. Statement of fact, kid.
You've offered no explanation. I have.
What *is* your explanation?
You need *something*, kid.
| Quote: | You now need to use some "logic" to explain why *my* explanation is
faulty, and *yours* (as yet missing) is not.
Do it, flux-boy.
You want to try to argue that the fact that 1000BaseT is a commodity
available in consumer stores has no relevance. Go ahead. Argue it.
I already have.
No, you haven't. Don't lie. It makes you look even sillier than the
rest of your posting!
Perhaps you should reread the thread.
|
I have done, kid. Go back to school.
| Quote: | That's the logic that *you* need.
I (and others) have presented vast amounts of information that
supports the contention that you are too dumb to accept.
And you are going to post this?
Obviously you are unfamiliar with the English language. Check the
tense, boy.
Future. Because it hasn't happened yet.
|
Silly boy. Check the tenses. It's not my problem if you dislike,
cannot read, or have forgot what has been posted.
It's yours.
| Quote: | The only thing I've seen is something about gigabit and 1999, which
doesn't seem to have any relevance to your argument. What exactly is
your argument?
Go back and read it, dimwit!
It isn't there.
|
*Sigh* A totaly juvenile idiot (i.e. you) claimed that gigabit was
recent and rare. Since I've been using for six years, and it's a
commodity stuck in virtually everything these days, it is obviously
neither recent nor rare.
Your assertion (the "recent and rare" thing) fails.
| Quote: | You claimed a given technology is "new". I've shown it isn't.
But it *is* new.
|
No, it isn't. Six years, and a generation, is not "new". "New" is
10-gigabit ethernet.
| Quote: | You know the significance, laddy.
I do?
|
I note you've snipped the fact, so yes, you've proved you do.
For the fourth (or is it fifth), what do you do during the days?
Malc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flux
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:34 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
In article <ot99s0djgesgr2h1o0jcufu3v169b5uis3@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
| Quote: | It implies there is no logic in the above statement.
No, it doesn't. It clearly notes that in my opinion (shared,
|
Yes, it does. It has nothing to do with whether those statement are
actually logical or not; it's just meant to question them with the
implication there is no logic actually there.
| Quote: | I thought it was the other way around.
Which says a lot about what *you* thought, but we've pretty
established your lack of significant ability when it comes to thought.
|
I still think it.
| Quote: | I don't see it.
Again, evidently, and at this stage your blindness is your problem.
|
Or there is nothing to see in your position.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
Another "Logic"?
Nope. Statement of fact, kid.
|
So? Why should I provide an explanation for something has no logical
relevance to the topic?
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation. I have.
|
Where is it?
| Quote: | Perhaps you should reread the thread.
I have done, kid. Go back to school.
|
Reread or misread?
| Quote: | That's the logic that *you* need.
I (and others) have presented vast amounts of information that
supports the contention that you are too dumb to accept.
And you are going to post this?
Obviously you are unfamiliar with the English language. Check the
tense, boy.
Future. Because it hasn't happened yet.
Silly boy. Check the tenses. It's not my problem if you dislike,
|
Future tense implies something has not yet occurred.
| Quote: | *Sigh* A totaly juvenile idiot (i.e. you) claimed that gigabit was
recent and rare.
|
I still claim this.
| Quote: | Since I've been using for six years, and it's a
|
You have apparently made false claims before. Who's to say this isn't
also false?
| Quote: | commodity stuck in virtually everything these days, it is obviously
neither recent nor rare.
|
This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
| Quote: | Your assertion (the "recent and rare" thing) fails.
You claimed a given technology is "new". I've shown it isn't.
But it *is* new.
No, it isn't. Six years, and a generation, is not "new". "New" is
10-gigabit ethernet.
|
No, gigabit is *still* new.
| Quote: | You know the significance, laddy.
I do?
I note you've snipped the fact, so yes, you've proved you do.
|
Where is the proof? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Malcolm Weir
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:03 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:34:24 GMT, flux <support@fluxsoft.com> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <ot99s0djgesgr2h1o0jcufu3v169b5uis3@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
It implies there is no logic in the above statement.
No, it doesn't. It clearly notes that in my opinion (shared,
Yes, it does.
|
Don't be an ignorant and stupid little boy. It doesn't.
| Quote: | It has nothing to do with whether those statement are
actually logical or not; it's just meant to question them with the
implication there is no logic actually there.
|
Whatever you *meant* to write is totally different from what you *did*
write. You really need to get that into your thick head!
| Quote: | I thought it was the other way around.
Which says a lot about what *you* thought, but we've pretty
established your lack of significant ability when it comes to thought.
I still think it.
|
Fair enough. But we've established the value of your "thought"!
| Quote: | I don't see it.
Again, evidently, and at this stage your blindness is your problem.
Or there is nothing to see in your position.
|
Since we've established your feeble-mindedness, I think anyone with
half a clue (i.e. everybody except you) would correctly pick which
option is most likely to be true...
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
Another "Logic"?
Nope. Statement of fact, kid.
So? Why should I provide an explanation for something has no logical
relevance to the topic?
|
Ah! So you meant to write "irrelevant" not "Logic". Got it. When
you learn to write what you mean, come back. Until then, you add
nothing, and are frankly a total waste of bandwidth.
Don't forget your homework, kid.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation. I have.
Where is it?
|
In those patterns of squiggly things on your screen. You need to
learn to read *as well* as write, little boy!
| Quote: | Perhaps you should reread the thread.
I have done, kid. Go back to school.
Reread or misread?
|
Unlike you, I *can* read and write what I mean. So let's leave it the
way I wrote it, huh?
| Quote: | That's the logic that *you* need.
I (and others) have presented vast amounts of information that
supports the contention that you are too dumb to accept.
And you are going to post this?
Obviously you are unfamiliar with the English language. Check the
tense, boy.
Future. Because it hasn't happened yet.
Silly boy. Check the tenses. It's not my problem if you dislike,
Future tense implies something has not yet occurred.
|
That's true. Which is why I used the past tense.
Your stupidity and juvenile conduct just grows...
| Quote: | *Sigh* A totaly juvenile idiot (i.e. you) claimed that gigabit was
recent and rare.
I still claim this.
|
I'm glad you acknowledge that you are totally juvenile and an idiot!
| Quote: | Since I've been using for six years, and it's a
You have apparently made false claims before. Who's to say this isn't
also false?
|
Cite, moron!
Provide cites!
And tell your mommy that you've been naughty, again!
| Quote: | commodity stuck in virtually everything these days, it is obviously
neither recent nor rare.
This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
|
AH, *finally* a valid point. It's also not actually true, but the
point is valid.
We've established you know as much about serious applications of
storage as the average 5 year old, so I'm not going to waste any more
time disproving the point for you, since you lack the integrity (and
probably reading skills) to understand it.
And I'm sure you've got homework to do, kid.
| Quote: | Your assertion (the "recent and rare" thing) fails.
You claimed a given technology is "new". I've shown it isn't.
But it *is* new.
No, it isn't. Six years, and a generation, is not "new". "New" is
10-gigabit ethernet.
No, gigabit is *still* new.
|
Only in your mind. In the real world, we've been using the stuff for
so long that we've replaced entire storage systems (at their end of
life) since gigabit was installed.
Of course, everything's relative: gigabit ethernet is "new" compared
to, say, the stored-program computer.
| Quote: | You know the significance, laddy.
I do?
I note you've snipped the fact, so yes, you've proved you do.
Where is the proof?
|
LOL! We don't proof, kiddo, since we both know the significance!
Malc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flux
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2004 8:00 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
In article <0vmbs09bq3rmoarcsasniaut2fqdlo3par@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
| Quote: | On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:34:24 GMT, flux <support@fluxsoft.com> wrote:
In article <ot99s0djgesgr2h1o0jcufu3v169b5uis3@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
It implies there is no logic in the above statement.
No, it doesn't. It clearly notes that in my opinion (shared,
Yes, it does.
Don't be an ignorant and stupid little boy. It doesn't.
|
But that is what I mean.
| Quote: | It has nothing to do with whether those statement are
actually logical or not; it's just meant to question them with the
implication there is no logic actually there.
Whatever you *meant* to write is totally different from what you *did*
write. You really need to get that into your thick head!
I thought it was the other way around.
Which says a lot about what *you* thought, but we've pretty
established your lack of significant ability when it comes to thought.
I still think it.
Fair enough. But we've established the value of your "thought"!
|
Is that your argument?
| Quote: | I don't see it.
Again, evidently, and at this stage your blindness is your problem.
Or there is nothing to see in your position.
Since we've established your feeble-mindedness, I think anyone with
half a clue (i.e. everybody except you) would correctly pick which
option is most likely to be true...
|
Or not.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
Another "Logic"?
Nope. Statement of fact, kid.
So? Why should I provide an explanation for something has no logical
relevance to the topic?
Ah! So you meant to write "irrelevant" not "Logic". Got it. When
|
Logic? = irrelevance.
| Quote: | you learn to write what you mean, come back. Until then, you add
nothing, and are frankly a total waste of bandwidth.
Don't forget your homework, kid.
You've offered no explanation. I have.
Where is it?
In those patterns of squiggly things on your screen. You need to
learn to read *as well* as write, little boy!
|
So that's your argument?
| Quote: | Perhaps you should reread the thread.
I have done, kid. Go back to school.
Reread or misread?
Unlike you, I *can* read and write what I mean. So let's leave it the
|
So why didn't you?
| Quote: | That's true. Which is why I used the past tense.
|
which is wrong.
| Quote: | Your stupidity and juvenile conduct just grows...
*Sigh* A totaly juvenile idiot (i.e. you) claimed that gigabit was
recent and rare.
I still claim this.
I'm glad you acknowledge that you are totally juvenile and an idiot!
|
Where is your argument?
| Quote: | Since I've been using for six years, and it's a
You have apparently made false claims before. Who's to say this isn't
also false?
Cite, moron!
|
The claim you made about the Apple RAIDs appears to be out of whole
cloth.
| Quote: | This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
AH, *finally* a valid point.
|
It was my original point.
| Quote: | It's also not actually true, but the
point is valid.
|
Of course, it is true.
| Quote: | No, gigabit is *still* new.
Only in your mind. In the real world, we've been using the stuff for
so long that we've replaced entire storage systems (at their end of
life) since gigabit was installed.
|
Whatever world you consider the real world, Earth is not it.
| Quote: | Of course, everything's relative: gigabit ethernet is "new" compared
to, say, the stored-program computer.
|
Gigabit is probably new to most people using computers around say now.
| Quote: | You know the significance, laddy.
I do?
I note you've snipped the fact, so yes, you've proved you do.
Where is the proof?
LOL! We don't proof, kiddo, since we both know the significance!
|
You got me; I have no clue about this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Malcolm Weir
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2004 8:00 pm Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:13:07 GMT, flux <support@fluxsoft.com> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <0vmbs09bq3rmoarcsasniaut2fqdlo3par@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:34:24 GMT, flux <support@fluxsoft.com> wrote:
In article <ot99s0djgesgr2h1o0jcufu3v169b5uis3@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
It implies there is no logic in the above statement.
No, it doesn't. It clearly notes that in my opinion (shared,
Yes, it does.
Don't be an ignorant and stupid little boy. It doesn't.
But that is what I mean.
|
Who, little boy, do you think cares?
[ Snip ]
| Quote: | I still think it.
Fair enough. But we've established the value of your "thought"!
Is that your argument?
|
No. It's an observation about the worth of yours.
[ Snip ]
| Quote: | Since we've established your feeble-mindedness, I think anyone with
half a clue (i.e. everybody except you) would correctly pick which
option is most likely to be true...
Or not.
|
True. They're quite capable of noting that your opinion is utter
garbage, too.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
Another "Logic"?
Nope. Statement of fact, kid.
So? Why should I provide an explanation for something has no logical
relevance to the topic?
Ah! So you meant to write "irrelevant" not "Logic". Got it. When
Logic? = irrelevance.
|
Not at all! One can have a perfectly logical (but irrelevant)
observation, and a relevant but illogical one.
The two factors are unrelated.
| Quote: | In those patterns of squiggly things on your screen. You need to
learn to read *as well* as write, little boy!
So that's your argument?
|
No. The argument has been presented. You're too stupid to understand
it.
Your loss.
[ Snip ]
| Quote: | You have apparently made false claims before. Who's to say this isn't
also false?
Cite, moron!
The claim you made about the Apple RAIDs appears to be out of whole
cloth.
|
Not at all. I *understand* that you're too stupid to know that it
isn't, but that's your problem, little boy.
Look at, say, this: http://www.macintouch.com/xserve4.html under, e.g.
Tibor Grose's name.
You may also want to reconcile your bland claim that Apple's service
is wonderful with the reports there.
| Quote: | This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
AH, *finally* a valid point.
It was my original point.
|
Don't tell fibs, little boy, or your mommy will smack you!
It wasn't.
| Quote: | It's also not actually true, but the
point is valid.
Of course, it is true.
|
Not, perhaps, in the arena in which you "function". But in the real
world, gigabit is as common as RAID subsystems.
I'll quietly note that you apparently had no clue as to the point of
such things... given your "where are the disks" question.
| Quote: | No, gigabit is *still* new.
Only in your mind. In the real world, we've been using the stuff for
so long that we've replaced entire storage systems (at their end of
life) since gigabit was installed.
Whatever world you consider the real world, Earth is not it.
|
*Shrug* the facts remain: we've replaced entire storage systems since
gigabit was installed.
| Quote: | Of course, everything's relative: gigabit ethernet is "new" compared
to, say, the stored-program computer.
Gigabit is probably new to most people using computers around say now.
|
Well, most silly little boys in dorm rooms, yes.
If any serious data center would let you in their doors, you'd know
that gigabit is common as fibre in places that spend money on computer
systems.
| Quote: | You know the significance, laddy.
I do?
I note you've snipped the fact, so yes, you've proved you do.
Where is the proof?
LOL! We don't proof, kiddo, since we both know the significance!
You got me; I have no clue about this.
|
You have no clue about just about anything. But you're lying now.
Malc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flux
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:00 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
In article <t4dgs0dkhcs04tsi0hvqi64kgk7l08sjse@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
| Quote: | Fair enough. But we've established the value of your "thought"!
Is that your argument?
No. It's an observation about the worth of yours.
|
That was your argument.
| Quote: | [ Snip ]
Since we've established your feeble-mindedness, I think anyone with
half a clue (i.e. everybody except you) would correctly pick which
option is most likely to be true...
Or not.
True. They're quite capable of noting that your opinion is utter
garbage, too.
|
Or not.
| Quote: | You've offered no explanation *why* CompUSA (et al) do this. I have.
Another "Logic"?
Nope. Statement of fact, kid.
So? Why should I provide an explanation for something has no logical
relevance to the topic?
Ah! So you meant to write "irrelevant" not "Logic". Got it. When
Logic? = irrelevance.
Not at all!
|
Logic? = irrelevance
| Quote: | The two factors are unrelated.
|
In this case, logic? = irrelevance
| Quote: | In those patterns of squiggly things on your screen. You need to
learn to read *as well* as write, little boy!
So that's your argument?
No. The argument has been presented.
|
I take it that sentence above *is* the argument.
| Quote: | You have apparently made false claims before. Who's to say this isn't
also false?
Cite, moron!
The claim you made about the Apple RAIDs appears to be out of whole
cloth.
Not at all.
|
It most certainly does appear to be out of whole cloth.
| Quote: | You may also want to reconcile your bland claim that Apple's service
is wonderful with the reports there.
|
There isn't anything to reconcile it with. A few anecdotes from the
Internet don't count for much.
| Quote: | This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
AH, *finally* a valid point.
It was my original point.
It wasn't.
|
It was.
| Quote: | It's also not actually true, but the
point is valid.
Of course, it is true.
Not, perhaps, in the arena in which you "function". But in the real
world, gigabit is as common as RAID subsystems.
|
I function on a planet called Earth. Gigabit is not common on Earth.
| Quote: | I'll quietly note that you apparently had no clue as to the point of
such things... given your "where are the disks" question.
No, gigabit is *still* new.
Only in your mind. In the real world, we've been using the stuff for
so long that we've replaced entire storage systems (at their end of
life) since gigabit was installed.
Whatever world you consider the real world, Earth is not it.
*Shrug* the facts remain: we've replaced entire storage systems since
gigabit was installed.
|
Are you using MP3 player drives?
| Quote: | Gigabit is probably new to most people using computers around say now.
Well, most silly little boys in dorm rooms, yes.
|
As well as pretty much everyone else.
| Quote: | If any serious data center would let you in their doors, you'd know
that gigabit is common as fibre in places that spend money on computer
systems.
|
What relevance does a data center to have all networked systems? Do you
think the Internet is a single data center?
| Quote: | You got me; I have no clue about this.
You have no clue about just about anything. But you're lying now.
|
I really do have a clue. (No, wait, I must be lying.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Malcolm Weir
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 22, 2004 1:46 pm Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:17:34 GMT, flux <support@fluxsoft.com> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <t4dgs0dkhcs04tsi0hvqi64kgk7l08sjse@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
Fair enough. But we've established the value of your "thought"!
Is that your argument?
No. It's an observation about the worth of yours.
That was your argument.
|
If you understood logic, you'd spot the contradiction between your
last two responses!
But you don't. Because you're a silly little lying boy.
[ Snip ]
| Quote: | True. They're quite capable of noting that your opinion is utter
garbage, too.
Or not.
|
Since your opinion *is* utter garbage, if they fail to spot that, one
can draw conclusions about their mental acuity!
[ Snip ]
| Quote: | The two factors are unrelated.
In this case, logic? = irrelevance
|
In no case, you stupid little boy.
| Quote: | In those patterns of squiggly things on your screen. You need to
learn to read *as well* as write, little boy!
So that's your argument?
No. The argument has been presented.
I take it that sentence above *is* the argument.
|
I take it that you are stupid lying little boy.
For two reasons: the first is that there are two sentences above; the
second being that the sentences explicitly refute your view.
You lose. Moron.
| Quote: | You have apparently made false claims before. Who's to say this isn't
also false?
Cite, moron!
The claim you made about the Apple RAIDs appears to be out of whole
cloth.
Not at all.
It most certainly does appear to be out of whole cloth.
|
Yet it isn't, and I've provided cites.
You've provided the sort of diarrhea you typical gush.
| Quote: | You may also want to reconcile your bland claim that Apple's service
is wonderful with the reports there.
There isn't anything to reconcile it with. A few anecdotes from the
Internet don't count for much.
|
However, they *do* count for more than anything you could ever say.
| Quote: | This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
AH, *finally* a valid point.
It was my original point.
It wasn't.
It was.
|
Liar.
| Quote: | It's also not actually true, but the
point is valid.
Of course, it is true.
Not, perhaps, in the arena in which you "function". But in the real
world, gigabit is as common as RAID subsystems.
I function on a planet called Earth. Gigabit is not common on Earth.
|
Neither is 100BaseT.
For some value of "common".
In businesses which spend significant amounts of money on computers
(i.e. most businesses), it's as common as fiber.
| Quote: | I'll quietly note that you apparently had no clue as to the point of
such things... given your "where are the disks" question.
No, gigabit is *still* new.
Only in your mind. In the real world, we've been using the stuff for
so long that we've replaced entire storage systems (at their end of
life) since gigabit was installed.
Whatever world you consider the real world, Earth is not it.
*Shrug* the facts remain: we've replaced entire storage systems since
gigabit was installed.
Are you using MP3 player drives?
|
Of course not, because we're not stupid.
We're using enterprise 73GB 15K drives.
| Quote: | Gigabit is probably new to most people using computers around say now.
Well, most silly little boys in dorm rooms, yes.
As well as pretty much everyone else.
|
Not so. But since you are a silly little boy in a dorm room, it's not
surprising that you are incapable of realizing that!
| Quote: | If any serious data center would let you in their doors, you'd know
that gigabit is common as fibre in places that spend money on computer
systems.
What relevance does a data center to have all networked systems? Do you
think the Internet is a single data center?
|
Feeble, little liar boy!
No-one is talking about "all network systems". If you were to try to
claim that (say) four wheel drive vehicles are uncommon (a precisely
similar argument) on the basis that a significant number of vehicles
lack it, your argument would be as specious as the one you are trying
to advance here.
And, just an FYI, kid, not all network systems are connected to the
internet. For good reason.
(Think government. Heck, just think.)
| Quote: | You got me; I have no clue about this.
You have no clue about just about anything. But you're lying now.
I really do have a clue. (No, wait, I must be lying.)
|
*Shrug* You do lie, and you have no clue.
Malc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flux
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 23, 2004 8:05 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
In article <9icis0tbh6q5e9p8gomhe4moepu15i482p@4ax.com>,
Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org> wrote:
| Quote: | If you understood logic, you'd spot the contradiction between your
last two responses!
|
I think I see it.
| Quote: | Since your opinion *is* utter garbage, if they fail to spot that, one
can draw conclusions about their mental acuity!
|
I guess it's not very acute.
| Quote: | [ Snip ]
The two factors are unrelated.
In this case, logic? = irrelevance
In no case,
|
In this case.
| Quote: | No. The argument has been presented.
For two reasons: the first is that there are two sentences above;
|
I see one.
| Quote: | the
second being that the sentences explicitly refute your view.
|
There was no second sentence.
| Quote: | Yet it isn't, and I've provided cites.
|
Which are where exactly?
| Quote: | There isn't anything to reconcile it with. A few anecdotes from the
Internet don't count for much.
However, they *do* count for more than anything you could ever say.
|
Anecdotes do count for something.
| Quote: | This is evidence that is recent development. It implies it may be
common, but not that its usage actually is.
AH, *finally* a valid point.
It was my original point.
It wasn't.
It was.
Liar.
|
It wasn't.
| Quote: | Not, perhaps, in the arena in which you "function". But in the real
world, gigabit is as common as RAID subsystems.
I function on a planet called Earth. Gigabit is not common on Earth.
Neither is 100BaseT.
|
I agree.
| Quote: | For some value of "common".
In businesses which spend significant amounts of money on computers
(i.e. most businesses), it's as common as fiber.
|
I agree with fiber being common; it's found in cereal.
| Quote: | Are you using MP3 player drives?
Of course not, because we're not stupid.
|
And boring. MP3 players are fun to listen to.
| Quote: | We're using enterprise 73GB 15K drives.
|
And very little money. No wonder you don't have any MP3 players.
| Quote: | Gigabit is probably new to most people using computers around say now.
Well, most silly little boys in dorm rooms, yes.
As well as pretty much everyone else.
Not so.
|
It is so.
| Quote: | No-one is talking about "all network systems".
|
I was.
| Quote: | If you were to try to
claim that (say) four wheel drive vehicles are uncommon (a precisely
similar argument) on the basis that a significant number of vehicles
|
They are.
| Quote: | And, just an FYI, kid, not all network systems are connected to the
internet. For good reason.
|
So?
| Quote: | (Think government.
|
I agree. The Iraqi government is not. But I bet they have gigabit and
fiber.
| Quote: | *Shrug* You do lie, and you have no clue.
|
I have no clue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Malcolm Weir
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:05 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
l?Enfant
Honor the memory of Grandma with this dish by utilizing her good
silver soup tureen and her great grandchildren (crawfish, crab or
lobster will work just as well, however this dish is classically
made with crawfish).
Stuffed infant heads, stuffed crawfish heads, stuffed crab or lobster shells;
make patties if shell or head is not available
(such as with packaged crawfish, crab, or headless baby).
Flour
oil
onions
bell peppers
garlic salt, pepper, etc.
3 cups chicken stock
2 sticks butter
3 tablespoons oil
First stuff the heads, or make the patties (see index)
then fry or bake.
Set aside to drain on paper towels.
Make a roux with butter, oil and flour,
brown vegetables in the roux, then add chicken stock and
allow to simmer for 20 minutes.
Add the patties or stuffed heads, and some loose crawfish,
lobster, long piglet, or what have you.
Cook on low for 15 minutes, then allow it to set for at least
15 minutes more.
Serve over steamed rice; this dish is very impressive!
Stuffed Cabbage Rolls
Babies really can be found under a cabbage leaf -
or one can arrange for ground beef to be found there instead.
8 large cabbage leaves
1 lb. lean ground newborn human filets, or ground chuck
Onions
peppers
celery
garlic
soy sauce
salt pepper, etc
Olive oil
breadcrumbs
Tomato Gravy (see index)
Boil the cabbage leaves for 2 minutes to soften.
In skillet, brown the |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flux
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:34 am Post subject:
Re: What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a c |
|
|
vegetables are tender
(2 hours approximately).
Continue seasoning to taste.
Before serving, add butter and pasta,
serve piping with hot bread and butter.
Offspring Rolls
Similar to Vietnamese style fried rolls, they have lots of meat
(of course this can consist of chicken, beef, pork, or shrimp).
Who can resist this classic appetizer; or light lunch served with
a fresh salad? Versatility is probably this recipe?s greatest virtue,
as one can use the best part of a prime, rare, yearling, or the
morticians occasional horror: a small miracle stopped short by a
drunk driver, or the innocent victim of a drive-by shooting...
2 cups finely chopped very young human flesh
1 cup shredded cabbage
1 cup bean sprouts
5 sprigs green onion, finely chopped
5 cloves minced garlic
4-6 ounces bamboo shoots
Sherry
chicken broth
oil for deep frying (1 gallon)
Salt
pepper
soy & teriyaki
minced ginger, etc.
1 tablespoon cornstarch dissolved in a little cold water
1 egg beaten
Make the stuffing:
Marinate the flesh in a mixture of soy and teriyaki sauces
then stir fry in hot oil for till brown - about 1 minute, remove.
Stir-fry the vegetables.
Put the meat back into the wok and adjust the seasoning.
De-glaze with sherry, cooking off the alcohol.
Add broth (optional) cook a few more minutes.
Add the cornstarch, cook a few minutes till thick,
then place the stuffing into a colander and cool;
2 hours
Wrap the rolls:
Place 3 tablespoons of stuffing in the wrap, roll tightly -
corner nearest you first, fold 2 side corners in,
wrap till remaining corner is left.
Brush with egg, seal, and allow to sit on the seal for
a few minutes.
Fry the rolls:
325° if using egg roll wraps, 350° for spring roll wraps.
Deep fry in peanut oil till crispy golde |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in