| Author |
Message |
Matt Baldwin
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:17 am Post subject:
NetApp |
|
|
OK. I'm not sure if this is the right group to post this in or not.
If not, let me know. :)
I'm wondering if there's a way to tune the number of simultaneous SMB
connections coming into a NetApp. Also, is there a way of tuning the
maximum number of receive buffers that the NetApp can allocate?
I'm running a F760 w/ 6.5.3P4.
Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks!
-matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boatgeek
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:28 am Post subject:
Re: NetApp |
|
|
Matt,
What symptoms are you seeing? Are you trying to limit the number of
SMB connections (now called CIFS)?
Doug |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matt Baldwin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:13 am Post subject:
Re: NetApp |
|
|
Actually, the opposite. I'm attempting to serve content from the
NetApp to a group of Windows boxes. I'm seeing the following issue
when serving web content off of the NetApp:
"The network BIOS command limit has been
reached"
Microsoft has a KB article,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810886, which
discusses the error.
On the Windows end you can increase a value in the Registry, MaxCmds,
which increases the number of SMB/CIFS connections to a file server.
If the file server were a Windows file server you would adjust
MaxWorkItems and MaxMpxCt (MaxMpxCount) to tune, that is increase, the
amount of simultaneous SMB connections and increase the number of
receive buffers Windows will allocate to service those connections.
I've ran in a similiar scenario using a Windows 2003 file server and
haven't seen these errors.
Any help you can provide is very appreciated. Thanks.
-matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Faeandar
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:13 pm Post subject:
Re: NetApp |
|
|
On 22 Jun 2005 19:13:26 -0700, "Matt Baldwin"
<baldwinmathew@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Actually, the opposite. I'm attempting to serve content from the
NetApp to a group of Windows boxes. I'm seeing the following issue
when serving web content off of the NetApp:
"The network BIOS command limit has been
reached"
Microsoft has a KB article,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810886, which
discusses the error.
On the Windows end you can increase a value in the Registry, MaxCmds,
which increases the number of SMB/CIFS connections to a file server.
If the file server were a Windows file server you would adjust
MaxWorkItems and MaxMpxCt (MaxMpxCount) to tune, that is increase, the
amount of simultaneous SMB connections and increase the number of
receive buffers Windows will allocate to service those connections.
I've ran in a similiar scenario using a Windows 2003 file server and
haven't seen these errors.
Any help you can provide is very appreciated. Thanks.
-matt
|
You can try mucking with the option cifs.max_mpx. By default it's set
to 50, but it can be set higher.
~F |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matt Baldwin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 24, 2005 8:16 am Post subject:
Re: NetApp |
|
|
Thanks Faeander.
Do you know what the max limit is or what a safe limit would be?
Thanks.
-matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
boatgeek
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 25, 2005 7:03 am Post subject:
Re: NetApp |
|
|
126, 253 and 1124 are approved values. Use only these values and the
smallest value which will correct the situation as this affects
performance.
The most accurate way is to measure the Redirector Current Commands on
the client with Perfmon and to increase the value until the Current
Commands does not reach the negotiated limit.
See Microsoft Q191370 for more information.
Regards,
Doug Vibbert |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:16 am Post subject:
Re: NetApp |
|
|
Don't forget that the Windows Registry key,
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services
LanmanServer\parameters\MaxMpxCt
must also match cifs.max_mpx ...
Brian J. Mitchell
Systems Administrator
TRX
6 West Druid Hills Drive
Atlanta, GA 30329-2158 USA
http://www.trx.com
email: brian.mitchell@trx.com
office: +1 404 327 7238
mobile: +1 404 725 3128 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in