SDRAM memory width with Atmel AT91RM9200
CASTalk.com Forum Index CASTalk.com
Discussion of DSP, FPGA, storage and embedded system.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web castalk.com
SDRAM memory width with Atmel AT91RM9200

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CASTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System
Author Message
Stephen Jones
Guest





Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:11 pm    Post subject: SDRAM memory width with Atmel AT91RM9200 Reply with quote

We are designing a microcomputer based on the Atmel AT91RM9200
controller. We are gong to give it 128Mb of SDRAM, 4M X 32. I am
trying to decide whether to use 2 x 4M x 16 or 1 x 4M x 32. The
reference design uses 16 bit wide memories, which appear to be
slightly cheaper than the equivalent 32 with perhaps more
manufactureres. What do people feel, what are the advantages of each,
easier layout, better EMC, lower bus capacitance for a single chip ? I
am also looking at the option of adding two Ethernet ports but as yet
haven't worked out how to do it as it only has one MAC, could anyone
help?
Thanks


Steve Jones
Back to top
Ulf Samuelsson
Guest





Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:34 pm    Post subject: Re: SDRAM memory width with Atmel AT91RM9200 Reply with quote

Quote:
We are designing a microcomputer based on the Atmel AT91RM9200
controller. We are gong to give it 128Mb of SDRAM, 4M X 32. I am
trying to decide whether to use 2 x 4M x 16 or 1 x 4M x 32. The
reference design uses 16 bit wide memories, which appear to be
slightly cheaper than the equivalent 32 with perhaps more
manufactureres. What do people feel, what are the advantages of each,
easier layout, better EMC, lower bus capacitance for a single chip ? I
am also looking at the option of adding two Ethernet ports but as yet
haven't worked out how to do it as it only has one MAC, could anyone
help?
Thanks


Using a single SDRAM chip reduces size, and capacitance on the adress bus,
reducing power.
Routing may be less complex but this is unclear.
Using serial flash (Dataflash) will remove capacitance on the databus as
well.

External Ethernet is not so high cost. SMC91 seems to be popular in the
Linux community.
The alternatives I guess are to have an external three or four port switch
but this is possibly more expensive.
Yet another alternative is to use a USB <->Ethernet device, but throughput
should be quite limited.




--
Best Regards
Ulf at atmel dot com
These comments are intended to be my own opinion and they
may, or may not be shared by my employer, Atmel Sweden.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CASTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




VoIP Electronics Powered by phpBB