| Author |
Message |
Seb
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:17 pm Post subject:
PowerPath SLES9 SP1 installation issue |
|
|
Hi,
I'm trying to install PowerPath package on a SLES9.0 SP1 32Bits
machine. According EMCpowerlink website, I must use latest version of
PowerPath which is:
EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0-343.sles.i386
But installation failed complaining as follow:
------------------------------
house2:~/SAN/PowerPath/v4.4.0 # rpm -ivh
EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0-343.sles.i386.rpm
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
1:EMCpower.LINUX ###########################################
[100%]
PowerPath driver version magic mismatch
error: %post(EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0-343) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
-----------------------------
My machine is running SP1 *only* and complies with EMC requirements:
----------------------------
house2:~/SAN/PowerPath/v4.4.0 # SPident
CONCLUSION: ServicePack Level: SLES-9-i386-SP1 => up-to-date
----------------------------
My HBA drivers appears to be good an up to date for SLES9.0 SP1
----------------------------
house2:~/SAN/PowerPath/v4.4.0 # cat /proc/scsi/qla2xxx/1
QLogic PCI to Fibre Channel Host Adapter for QLE2360:
Firmware version 3.03.01 IPX, Driver version 8.00.00
Entry address = f88a1a20
ISP: ISP2322, Serial# U43773
Request Queue = 0x37680000, Response Queue = 0x375a0000
Request Queue count = 4096, Response Queue count = 512
Total number of active commands = 0
Total number of interrupts = 4562
Device queue depth = 0x20
Number of free request entries = 3891
Number of mailbox timeouts = 0
Number of ISP aborts = 0
Number of loop resyncs = 0
Number of retries for empty slots = 0
Number of reqs in pending_q= 0, retry_q= 0, done_q= 0, scsi_retry_q= 0
Host adapter:loop state = <READY>, flags = 0x1813
Dpc flags = 0x80000
MBX flags = 0x0
Link down Timeout = 045
Port down retry = 045
Login retry count = 045
Commands retried with dropped frame(s) = 0
Product ID = 4953 5020 2020 0005
SCSI Device Information:
scsi-qla0-adapter-node=200000e08b1f7d2f;
scsi-qla0-adapter-port=210000e08b1f7d2f;
scsi-qla0-target-0=500601683021a261;
SCSI LUN Information:
(Id:Lun) * - indicates lun is not registered with the OS.
( 0: 0): Total reqs 133, Pending reqs 0, flags 0x0, 0:0:00 00
( 0: 1): Total reqs 43, Pending reqs 0, flags 0x0, 0:0:00 00
---------------------
Also, I can say that I have the same trouble with a second machine
running SLES9.0 SP2 this time and get exact same error message. With
SLES9.0 SP2, the default QLA driver is 8.00.02 but produce exact same
error.
Does anyone knows why PowerPath complain about Driver version mismatch
and how to solve this ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Conor
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:16 pm Post subject:
Re: PowerPath SLES9 SP1 installation issue |
|
|
This error comes up when PowerPath encounters an unsupported version of
the SUSE Kernel.
Ensure that your particular Kernel version is supported by checking the
EMC Support Matrix |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seb
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:31 pm Post subject:
Re: PowerPath SLES9 SP1 installation issue |
|
|
Exact. But here is the funny part. EMC claims support for SLES9 SP1
which is running kernel revision 139. OR looks what's happen when you
switch the installation of the RPM verbose enough:
house2:~/SAN/PowerPath/v4.4.0 # rpm -ivvh
EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0-343.sles.i386.rpm
[...]
+ ref_driver=scsi_mod
++ modinfo scsi_mod
++ sed -n '/^vermagic:/s/^vermagic: *//p'
+ ref_version=2.6.5-7.139-smp SMP 586 REGPARM gcc-3.3
++ modinfo
//etc/opt/emcpower/EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0/bin/driver/emcp_slessmp
++ sed -n '/^vermagic:/s/^vermagic: *//p'
+ pp_version=2.6.5-7.151-smp SMP 586 REGPARM gcc-3.3
+ '[' suse = redhat ']'
'[' '2.6.5-7.151-smp SMP 586 REGPARM gcc-3.3' = '2.6.5-7.139-smp SMP
586 REGPARM gcc-3.3' ']'
+ return 1
+ '[' 1 '!=' 0 ']'
+ echo 'PowerPath driver version magic mismatch'
PowerPath driver version magic mismatch
+ rpm_reset 8020
+ exit 1
D: install: waitpid(8033) rc 8033 status 100
error: %post(EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0-343) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
+ rpm_proc=8020
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys
+ ps -p 8020
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Filemd5s
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Installtid
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Triggername
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Requirename
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Group
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages
D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages
house2:~/SAN/PowerPath/v4.4.0 # + '[' 1 = 0 ']'
+ '[' 1 ']'
+ rpm -e --noscripts EMCpower.LINUX-4.4.0-343
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ exit 1
Have a closer look above and notice the condition:
2.6.5-7.151-smp SMP 586 REGPARM gcc-3.3' = '2.6.5-7.139-smp SMP 586
REGPARM gcc-3.3
You are not dreaming. For EMC, a SLES9 SP1 is a machine having kernel
revision 151 !!! And they are not saying anything about anywhere !!!
After loaded this kernel revision, everything is ok. But why claiming
support for SP1 then ?
Thanks Conor.
Conor a écrit :
| Quote: | This error comes up when PowerPath encounters an unsupported version of
the SUSE Kernel.
Ensure that your particular Kernel version is supported by checking the
EMC Support Matrix |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tijgertim
Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 1
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:19 am Post subject:
Compatibility Matrix |
|
|
According to the EMC PowerPath Compatiblity Matrix, the minimum kernel version is 2.6.5.7-151.
I have just installed a new SLES9 server, with SP1 (kernel 139) and upgraded the kernel to the latest version available: 2.6.5.7-201
PowerPath installation still gives a magic mismatch - this is apparently because EMC ONLY support the 151 release and NOTHING else!
So if I wish to run a better, safer more reliable environment or certain applications require a kernel version higher than which EMC has specified, I have two choices: 1, no PowerPath or 2, No application /reduced stablity etc.
Personally I would even go as far as throwing the SAN out - certainly one supplied by EMC. Sadly the choice is not mine to make!  _________________ Tijger Tim
Beware of the Bill,
Please close the Gates |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|